| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
night-fisher Occasional


Joined: Jun 12, 2008 Posts: 245 Location: Stubbington Fareham Hants
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:45 pm Post subject: mono vs fluorocarbon |
|
|
Hi all
Can anyone please tell me the difference between mono and fluorocarbon and also can fluorocarbon be used as main line or is it better used for rig making.
cheers guys |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MJB Regular


Joined: Mar 23, 2005 Posts: 438 Location: Warminster, Wilts
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The main difference is that flourocarbon has a refractive index similar to water, so is virtually invisible in the sea. Flouro tends to be stiffer with better abrasion resistance too and sinks more readily. Given that pure flourocarbon (as opposed to nylon coated with flourocarbon) can be quite expensive, I'd stick with nylon for your mainline. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
night-fisher Occasional


Joined: Jun 12, 2008 Posts: 245 Location: Stubbington Fareham Hants
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks mate |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Welchy Occasional


Joined: Mar 03, 2008 Posts: 244 Location: South Wiltshire
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:10 am Post subject: Re: mono vs fluorocarbon |
|
|
| night-fisher wrote: |
Hi all
Can anyone please tell me the difference between mono and fluorocarbon and also can fluorocarbon be used as main line or is it better used for rig making.
cheers guys |
Hi night-fisher, flourocarbon is best used for your snoods. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|